COVID-19 Update, Antibody Studies and other news
Posted on May 15, 2020 Leave a Comment
Episode 2 of the Arctic Free Press
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
The Arctic Free Press Podcast Begins
Posted on April 23, 2020 Leave a Comment
An introduction to the podcast, background info about me, and a discussion on some facts, myths and observations on COVID-19
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
As we prepare for the struggle to continue
Posted on April 8, 2020 Leave a Comment

A few days ago, I was having a heated discussion with a friend over the data behind COVID-19 showing the death rate is a serious issue and the mortality rate is significantly dangerous compared to other causes. We discussed several different data points, but one kept spinning around inside my mind, and that was the oft stated opinion that people die in much larger numbers from other diseases every year.
I decided to dig down into that claim and see what was the truth and what was myth. I chose to look at New York state and then narrow down the parameters to New York City. The CDC keeps accurate records for death statistics, but I took one liberty with the data. I singled out New York City as the site for my analysis, but the statistics on the CDC webpage are for New York State. So what I did is a rough approximation of getting the right baselines statistics. New York City is home to roughly 8.5 million people which is 40% of the population of New York State. So I limited my death statistics from New York state to 40% in my analysis, the same percentage as New York City to New York state. I am aware that there will be a variation in this data in the real world. However, as I said, this is a rough approximation. I am not a trained statistician, but I feel that these numbers will be close enough for my rough analysis. If you disagree, that’s fine, run your own numbers and see what you get.
When I dove into the numbers, I found some very interesting pieces of data. This post will be fair and even, I’ll talk about the bad news/worst case scenarios as well as the good news/best case scenarios. According to the CDC’s statistics for 2017 (the last year fully listed), these are the following mortality statistics for medical issues for the entire state of New York:

For the top 10 causes of death there were 117,466 deaths in New York state for the entire year. Over 365 days in the year that works out to 2661 deaths per day on average. If we reduce the numbers to 40% (New York City’s share of the population for the state) we get 46,986 deaths for the year from the top 10 causes. That number averages out to 129 deaths per day on average. However, to get a rough approximation of the mortality rate of COVID-19 in New York City as compared to these other causes of death, we need to break it down even more. So….let’s do that, each cause of death will be approximated to 40% to account for NYC’s population.
- Heart Disease: 17,636
- Cancer: 13,982
- Accidents: 3075
- CLRD: 2903
- Stroke: 2505
- Flu/Pneumonia: 1807
- Diabetes: 1670
- Alzheimers: 1410
- Hypertension: 1080
- Septicemia: 918
That brings us to that 46,986 deaths from the 10 leading causes for New York City for the entire calendar year of 2017. That is spaced out over 365 days. Here’s the problem with the argument that people die from “plenty of other things besides COVID-19. COVID-19 has killed over 4500 New York City residents in 23 days. It will likely kill 20,000 New Yorkers in 60 days. Possibly as high as 30,000. Those kinds of numbers strain the healthcare system, causing morgues to fill up, refrigeration trucks to be used to store bodies and for the local NYC government to consider temporary mass graves to be dug in parks. If COVIF-19 kills in the numbers projected in the best case model for the rest of the year, COVID-19 will kill 40,000 New York City residents from 23 March (date of the first death for the state) through the rest of the year. COVID-19 will kill more New Yorkers in just over 8 months than the top 10 leading causes of death in one year. That is the best case model!!! That is good news though as it means that the death toll will peak on or around the 14th of April and then decline for the rest of the year will fewer than 100 deaths per day by August.
If the best case data model is off and NYC doesn’t peak on the 14th of April, the numbers could soar to 40,000 or even 50,000 deaths in just the next 60-90 days. The numbers could be as high as 80,000 dead by the end of the year, possibly 90,000 in the worst case scenario for New York City with multiple waves of COVID-19 hitting the city.
Currently only one model (the best case model) is showing the death rate peaking on the 14th, other models disagree. In the interest of fairness I should point out that the model that is showing a reduced death rate is the model being used by the Federal government, so it is very possible that model is accurate, but it is no guarantee.
Unfortunately, there is a problem with data models, they are almost always wrong. ALL OF THEM….models are reflective of a statistical snapshot from a moment in time with the data available at that moment. The models predicting 1 million deaths were obviously wrong, but they were possibly correct given the information available at the moment in time, the one model currently predicting a drop off on deaths starting in 10 days is possibly wrong as well. The models give a running estimate to health care providers, Emergency Managers, FEMA, the CDC and the local, state and Federal governments. No one should be treating them as gospel. These models will change daily and could show wild divergence between models.
For context, here are news articles about models in North Carolina and Georgia showing very different infection and death rates than the National model showing a lessening rate in both categories. All of these models can’t be right, and they can’t all be wrong. As stated, they are tools to help those in charge of fighting this virus gain perspective about what is happening. For a better explanation of how models work and are used, this article gives a lot of information.
All of this data about NYC and models and best case/worst case scenarios are examples of analysis. Analysis is a constant, never ending process that changes with the input of new, relevant data or the realization that existing data is less relevant or faulty. This understanding of all of this data and how it is being used in analysis is why I firmly believe the lockdowns will continue into May at least, possibly as long as July.
I also believe given the data I am looking at with the percentage of the population exposed to COVID-19 that we will likely have to do this all over next winter/spring. Pandemics come in waves, as has been historically attested. We will know for certain how much of the population has been exposed to COVID-19 once we get a reliable antibody test into mass production. If the numbers of those exposed surpasses 80%, the lockdowns likely won’t resurface at all. At that point we will have achieved enough herd immunity to limit any future outbreaks. If the exposure rate is 50-80% we will still see limited lockdowns as that isn’t enough herd immunity to stop another massive crush of cases resulting in a second round of pressure on the healthcare industry as well as an equally high or higher death rate. If the exposure rate is lower than 50% (as believed by most epidemiologists) then we will have to endure at least one more or even two more lockdowns of this type. A vaccine cannot be in full production in anything less than one year at the most extreme speed possible. Eighteen months is more likely and three full years is possible if the vaccine is not considered completely safe.
Vaccines take time, time to construct, time to test, time for extended trials and then time for mass production. It takes a long time to make 8 billion doses of a vaccine, so there will be no magic vaccine for the world in 3 months. It just isn’t possible, and for that reason, people should be prepared for another round of these types of lockdowns. The lockdowns are what has improved the Federal model on mortality, the lockdowns are what is helping us flatten the curve, the lockdowns are the sole reason we are starting to have hope that we can keep the US death toll below 200,000 for the year from COVID-19. Nobody is going to end them prematurely to save jobs. No politician in their right mind wants to have the deaths of thousands on their hands because they acted too quickly. I’ll address the economic pain and possible deaths from those conditions in a future post, I just want to say that in most of those cases, dying would be a choice or the outcome of bad choices. Dying from COVID-19 is rarely a choice and in the field of risk management, politicians will err on the side of caution and look to mitigate probable deaths from a virus over potential deaths from economic outcomes.
Finally, I just wanted to make the following comparison for perspective. No agenda with this final thought, just some information. From the day we invaded Iraq in February 2003 until today, 4425 American men and women died in theater from all causes. 17 years……combat, suicide in theater, accidents, 4425 dead. New York City has lost 4400 people in 24 days. Just New York City, not the rest of the state or any other city or state in the country. I firmly understand that thousands of New Yorkers die from other causes as I demonstrated earlier. That being said, if 4425 dead Americans in 17 years from war is a national tragedy, what are the deaths of 4400+ Americans in only one city in our country in 24 days? I’m not even talking about the other 10,000 dead Americans due to COVID-19 since February.
This virus is a threat to our Republic, far more of a threat than any economic pain we will suffer. Jobs can be recreated, money can be earned again, markets can grow again over time. No one will starve in this country, we will not descend into anarchy over the upcoming economic pain. Human lives, on the other hand, cannot be replaced or recreated. Every death from COVID-19 is felt by others, and it is felt more acutely due to so many not being able to say goodbye to their loved ones due to restrictions on visitations. Every person who dies from COVID-19 is irreplaceable, people are our nations most treasured and valuable resource…….my last thought is that I hope we make the decisions necessary to preserve that which is most dear to our nation.
Statistical data shows minority populations suffering more COVID-19 deaths than other racial groups
Posted on April 8, 2020 Leave a Comment

Preliminary analysis from several states is showing us a surprising aspect to the COVID-19 virus. It appears that it is hitting Americans of minority ethnic groups much more significantly than it is hitting white Americans. Black Americans in particular are being hit much harder than any other group. In the counties sampled from the article, Black Americans are suffering rates of infection three times higher than the national average and mortality rates six times higher.

Several reasons have been given for this, from higher rates of obesity, diabetes and heart disease in the Black Community, to the higher rates of poverty in the Black Community making social distancing harder for members of this community. A third possibility that is being explored is a genetic difference between Blacks, Hispanics, Caucasians and Asians.
We know from many decades of research that different racial groups have more resistance to certain diseases and less resistance to other diseases. For example, syphilis is a prime example of this. Prior to 1495 syphilis was unknown in the Old World, it was a disease that only existed among Native Americans. Smallpox is another example of a disease that killed significantly more of a particular racial group. Smallpox was brought to the New World by Spanish conquistadors and killed millions of Native Americans due to their being zero immunity against the smallpox pathogen. Europeans on the other hand had at least built up a partial immune system response to smallpox and it killed in much smaller numbers.
Something similar may be at play here with Black Americans, there may be some genetic expression in Black Americans genome that is leading to these higher death rates. Of course it could just be the poorer health and/or societal disadvantages that many Black Americans suffer from. It will be interesting to see some reliable data from Africa and compare it to data for Black Americans to see if there is a matching trend.
Japan to declare COVID-19 National Emergency on 07 APRIL 2020
Posted on April 5, 2020 Leave a Comment

I’m currently working on part two of my long analysis/recap of how COVID-19 spread across the world and where we went wrong. During my research, I came across this article from a few hours ago. Japan is seeing a large spread of COVID-19 in its metropolitan areas and as a result is declaring a national emergency.
This is a rather big deal as Japan was heralded recently as a country that had effectively handled the COVID-19 outbreak. Either Japan wasn’t testing enough of their population or they misjudged the situation. Either way, Japan is set to declare a national emergency, likely ordering the residents of large cities to stop working and leaving their homes. Hopefully, the government of Japan has made the right decision in enough time to have a positive effect.
Things will get worse
Posted on April 3, 2020 Leave a Comment
Things will get worse, there is no magic fix for any of this. There is no last minute “cavalry charge” coming to save the day. All we can do is to turn fully face the storm that is coming and accept that it is coming. Many of you don’t want to hear this, I don’t want to hear this either, but this is where we are and this is our reality. The next 60 days and especially the next 21 will be brutal, brutal in a way that I fear the American public are not prepared for. For most people there has been a slow and dawning realization that things were going bad, but for most this seemed like some far off “over the horizon disaster” that wouldn’t touch us or our homes. The American public, sealed in their bubble of safety and ignorant bliss, didn’t want to believe that such a moment was coming. The moment has arrived and we can cast blame on many places, but there are only two areas where our blame and our coming anger should be focused on; China and ourselves……..how did we get here? In part 1 of a 3 part series, I will lay out what the virus is, how it spreads, and a timeline of how China dropped the ball on this situation.
When this finally ends and the world begins to rebuild from the pain, death and economic loss that we will all feel in one way or another, we will look back and wonder what happened. Our feelings of sadness will turn to anger, and that anger should be initially focused on China. China is ultimately responsible for the initial spread of this virus, there is no other way to look at it. However, before we examine the role of China is causing this catastrophe, we need to address why COVID-19 is as deadly as it is. There are two factors that make COVID-19 uniquely suited to causing so much trouble for humans; the way it is spread and what it does to the human body.
COVID-19 spreads at a rate that is higher than many other pathogens out there. The way that disease spread is calculated is called the R “naught” value. Every single disease out there has a different R naught value, some are very high, some are low, but this value is important to understand. The higher the R naught value, the faster and more exponential the spread. What the R naught value measures is how many additional healthy people does each infected person expose to the pathogen. In viruses like the seasonal flu, the R naught value is 1.3. That means that each person with the seasonal flu infects 1.3 people. A mathematical principle would look like this 1 healthy person infects 1.3 people, 1.3 people would infect an additional 1.3 people, meaning that 1.7 people would then be infected, and they in turn would infect 1.3 people each, scaling up the entire time. A 1.3 R naught value is not great, but COVID-19 has a much, much higher R naught value. The value varies, but one study from Europe shows us that the value is as low as 3.1 up to as high as 6.5. That means that each person could possibly infect 6.5 additional people, which would be catastrophic if true. If the R naught value for COVID-19 is even as low as 3, it means that the virus is 3 times more contagious than the seasonal flu, possibly six times as contagious, but the problem doesn’t stop there.
The COVID-19 virus is called a Novel Corona Virus, because it is novel “or new” to the human race, meaning that we have never encountered this particular pathogen before. This unique organism didn’t even come into existence until November 2019. That matters because as a novel corona virus, it means the human race and our amazing immune systems have never encountered this organism at any point in human history. That means that our immune systems have no built in defense against it and when it is encountered in our bodies, our immune systems are unfamiliar with it and respond with a massive strike on the virus. This “war within our bodies” eventually goes nuclear with all parts of our immune system responding to the virus in a “scorched earth” type of battle. The casualties in white blood cells, dead virus and other cells from this war can lead to significant tissue damage (especially in the lungs), serious complications and the death toll we are seeing. There are historical examples of this type of pathogen killing tens of millions of people throughout history. The deaths of millions of Native Americans from smallpox, measles and other viruses and bacteria were the result of novel pathogens encountering populations that had never been exposed to them before. Fortunately, it appears our fatality rate will be nowhere near what happened to Native Americans in the 16th-18th centuries, but it reflects how deadly novel pathogens can be.
Now that we have reviewed how the virus spreads and briefly discussed what it does to the human body, we should probably talk about the role China has played in this pandemic. The virus came into existence sometime in mid-November 2019, we know this because there are methods to trace the virus’s age by analyzing the genome of the virus. We have also determined that the original species the COVID-19 virus inhabited was most likely a species of bat. Viruses in most cases exist in only one species at a time, to “colonize” a new species a virus needs to do two things; mutate and find a vector, or transmission route into the new host species. In the case of COVID-19 the genetic pathway of mutations remains unclear, we may never know when or where the virus that became COVID-19 jumped out of bats into another species. However, we do know what the other species was, it was most likely Pangolins, a scaly anteater type of animal found in Africa and more importantly South East-Asia. DNA and protein sequences isolated from pangolin tissue was analyzed by researchers in several locations around the world. The researchers identified protein sequences in sick Pangolins lungs that were 91% identical to the virus proteins found in humans infected with COVID-19. Other species could also be part of this mutation chain, but we now know that bats and pangolins are involved in the mutation of COVID-19.
Knowing the mutation chain is important, but so is understanding the vector method into human beings. In many parts of China, there exists a type of market called a “wet market”, such markets are known for selling live animals such as cats, dogs, fish, rabbits, bats and many other types of wild animals for consumption. Wet markets are named after the melting ice used to preserve the food, as well as the constant washing of the market floors when they are covered in blood from the animals. The markets are unsanitary and are often locations where outbreaks of disease occur. Currently the most likely hypothesis we have is that someone working in the market came into contact with a butchered pangolin and somehow ingested the precursor virus to COVID-19, which in turn mutated inside the body of the first human that was exposed to it, turning into the COVID-19 virus. With a new outbreak of disease, we start to look for a “patient zero”, the first person likely infected with the pathogen in question. With COVID-19, we think we know who the patient zero is. This is important because it tells us that the virus most likely came into existence in Mid-November, and that gives us an opportunity to back track the spread of the virus. Finally, knowing who and where patient zero is from, allows us to take a look at the reality of COVID-19 versus the lies the Chinese government told the world for weeks and weeks.
The outbreak of this disease began in China in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, in Hubei province which is in south Central China. The first week of December saw the emergence of the so called patient zero, with additional individuals admitted to Wuhan hospitals in the first 21 days of December. With several people showing similar, yet unique symptoms, the doctors in Wuhan had to know they were dealing with something new. Looking back at reports from China, the timeline of COVID-19 spread for December and January looks like this:
DECEMBER 2019
- 06 December 2019: a 53-year-old woman whose husband had previously been admitted for pneumonia-like symptoms presented with pneumonia and was hospitalized in the isolation ward.
- 21 December 2019: Wuhan doctors begin to notice a “cluster of pneumonia cases with an unknown cause.” A cluster of cases points to community spread and an unknown cause points to a possible new pathogen. At this point the government of China should have informed the World Health Organization and key members of the international community, including the G-20 nations and the UN.
- 25 December 2019: Chinese medical staff in two hospitals in Wuhan are suspected of contracting viral pneumonia and are quarantined. This moment confirms human to human spread, and the fact that China enacted a quarantine is an indicator that they were aware that this was something new and different. Yet at this time still no action was taken.
- 31 December 2019: Dr. Li Wenliang sent a message to a group of other doctors warning them about a possible outbreak of an illness that resembled severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), urging them to take protective measures against infection. The government of China severely reprimanded him for speaking to doctors outside of China and Dr Li subsequently died while treating COVID-19 patients in Wuhan.
January 2020
- 01 January 2020: An employee of one genomics company received a phone call from an official at the Hubei Provincial Health Commission, ordering the company to stop testing all samples from Wuhan related to the new disease and destroy all existing samples. Also, according to a New York Times study of cellphone data from China, close to 200,000 people leave Wuhan that day on vacations around the world. It is estimated close to two dozen airlines have direct flights to Wuhan.
- 03 January 2020: China’s National Health Commission, the nation’s top health authority, ordered institutions not to publish any information related to the unknown disease and to destroy samples of the virus.”
- 04 January 2020 Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention receives a summary paper of the virus and what is happening in China from Chinese colleagues. Redfield informs the Department of Health and Human Services.
- 06 January 2020: The CDC “issued a level 1 travel watch — the lowest of its three levels — for China’s outbreak. It said the cause and the transmission mode aren’t yet known, and it advised travelers to Wuhan to avoid living or dead animals, animal markets, and contact with sick people.” This is damning towards the government of China, they knew human to human transmission was occurring and they didn’t tell anyone what was happening. In my opinion, this is the day when the ability to stop the pandemic was lost. The government of China didn’t tell the world how the virus was spreading, and absent clear information, other governments put in standard travel restrictions.
- 08 January 2020: The US offers to send a crisis response team from the Centers for Disease Control, the government of China refuses to accept the offer of aid. also on this day the Chinese government claims, “there is no evidence that the new virus is readily spread by humans, and it has not been tied to any deaths.”
- 13 January 2020: The government of Thailand announces a case of the virus in a 61-year-old Chinese woman who was visiting from Wuhan, becoming the first case outside of China.
- 14 January 2020: Six weeks after the first evidence of human-to-human transmission in Wuhan, the World Health Organization releases a statement that says: according to Chinese investigations, there is no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). This is a flat out lie, at this point human to human transmission has been observed for over six weeks. Again, the government of China and the WHO lied to the world about the severity of this threat.
- 15 January 2020: Japan confirms its first case of COVID-19. Also on this day, the government in Wuhan, China states that human to human transmission of this virus is possible, but further spread of this virus is unlikely.
- 18 January 2020: Health and Human Services Secretary Hank Azar presents President Trump with the first briefing on the COVID-19 situation.
- 20 January 2020: The Wuhan Municipal Health Commission declares for the last time in its daily bulletin, “no related cases were found among the close contacts. From this point forward, the Chinese government begins to slowly acknowledge that the virus is able to spread by human to human transmission.
- 21 January 2020: The CDC confirms the first case of COVID-19 in the US, a man from Snohomish county, Washington. who returned from China 6 days earlier. At this point it is estimated that 9 million people had visited Wuhan and had left to travel across China or to other countries around the world. Even if only 1% of the 9 million had been exposed to COVID-19 that would be 90,000 people possibly spreading the virus on their travels, seeding it in any country or location they visited.
- 23 January 2020: Chinese authorities announce their first steps for a quarantine of Wuhan. Also on this day, Vietnam and Singapore record their first confirmed cases of COVID-19. By this date an unknown number of Chinese citizens had travelled around the world as carriers of the virus. The average citizen from China is not to be blamed for this spread, but the Chinese government knew, they knew what they had by this point and they still were only just beginning to engage in quarantines of cities like Wuhan.
- 24 January 2020: Vietnam reports person-to-person transmission, and several countries record their first instance of human to human transmission. Within 3 days, the US sees cases in 5 other locations, meaning that the chances for stopping the pandemic have come and gone.
- 25 January 2020: France, Canada, Malaysia and Australia record their first cases of COVID-19, meaning that the virus is now present on 4 of the 6 populated continents on Earth.
- 31 January 2020: The U.K., Russia, Sweden, and Spain confirm their first 2019-nCoV cases. The World Health Organization declares the 2019-nCoV outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. The United States CDC states that COVID-19 is a public health emergency and begins screening people entering the country from China.
The government of China had close to sixty days to tell the world what was happening in their country. Instead, they engaged in a propaganda campaign designed to confuse the world about what was happening. The cost of this deception is already extremely high and will continue as the virus continues to spread. When this is all said and done, there must be a reckoning with China. The US and the world must take concrete steps to both punish China and work to bring back certain segments of our manufacturing and pharmaceutical bases. We must take these steps to ensure that the next time this happens, and there will be a next time, we are able to take care of our citizens without having to rely on a despotic regime that is in all intents and purposes our enemy. Part II will focus on how Europe and the United States fail to prepare adequately for COVID-19 and how unserious our responses were.
